2oceansvibe News | South African and international news

Sponsored by RSAWeb rss
2ov Radio
  • Home
  • About
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Seth Rotherham
  • du Cap Collection
  • Café du Cap
  • Cabine du Cap
  • Media Packs / Advertising
  • Contact
    • Contact
    • Anonymous Tips
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
Seth Rotherham
  • Uber Does Not Want To Protect Its Drivers

    12 Sep 2019 by Carrie in America, Business, law, uber
    Related Posts
    • Everything You Need To Know About Saturday's Cape Town E-Prix
    • Thursday Morning Spice
    • "Shame!" Thieving Bolt Drivers Paraded Naked In Polokwane
    • Are The Days Of Owning Your Own Car Numbered? Studies Suggest So
    • Don't Talk To Me, Talk To My AI - World's First Lawyer App Goes On Trial

    Anyone who has had a conversation with an Uber driver about their working conditions in South Africa has heard some harrowing tales.

    From the lack of safety (a number of Uber drivers have been badly hurt or killed on the job) to the fact that they have hardly any protection on the work front, it’s a tough profession to be in.

    The company gets away with doing the bare minimum when it comes to its drivers because drivers are registered as independent contractors.

    It’s the same in the United States, but that has the potential to change following legislation passed on Wednesday by California lawmakers that seek to reclassify many “gig economy” workers from independent contractors to employees ― with additional benefits and protections.

    The Huffington Post breaks it down:

    The ride-hailing company told reporters Wednesday that its drivers will not be reclassified as employees, even if Assembly Bill 5 is signed into law as widely expected. Tony West, Uber’s chief legal representative, said the drivers will still be considered independent contractors because “drivers’ work is outside the usual course of Uber’s business.”

    That’s right – Uber drivers do their work outside of Uber. So, they don’t actually work for Uber? Yeah, I’m confused, too.

    West described the company’s business as “serving as a technology platform for several different types of digital marketplaces.”

    That’s corporate-speak for “we don’t want to have to care about our employees” in case you’re wondering.

    Under the legislation ― which the state Assembly approved on Wednesday and which Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is expected to sign ― many gig-economy workers stand to gain new labor protections and benefits, like a minimum wage, unemployment and disability insurance, and the right to form a union.

    Oh no, we can’t have that. If everyone starts earning a liveable wage, is protected in the case of unemployment and disability, and has the right to protect themselves with a union, there’ll be no living with them.

    The legislation clarifies the conditions under which a worker should be considered an employee. It says workers should be treated as independent contractors only if (a) they are “free from the control and direction” of the company that hired them, (b) their work falls outside the usual business of the company and (c) they are engaged in work in an independent business of the same type as the company’s.

    Uber claims that its employees drivers pass that test. Sorry, not ‘its drivers’, the drivers. As such, it and other big tech companies lobbied extensively against the legislation. Their companies’ bottom lines would be dramatically affected if thousands of drivers were reclassified as employees for whom they’d then have to pay additional benefits.

    Uber and Lyft have repeatedly suggested that drivers wouldn’t enjoy as much flexibility if they were made full employees. The companies have said they could meet some of the workers’ demands by establishing a drivers association and working with lawmakers to commit to things like minimum pay.

    Gig Workers Rising called the tech leaders’ proposals “a watered-down version” of the demands drivers have been making for months.

    With AB5 now expected to become law, Uber said Wednesday that it is pursuing “several legal and political options,” including a statewide ballot initiative in 2020.

    Something’s gotta give.

    We’ll be looking out for the international effects of the new law.

    [source:huffpost]

    • ← Video Analysis Of Amy’Leigh Kidnapping Includes Teacher’s Voice Notes
    • James Dalton Filmed Brawling With Security Outside Sea Point Restaurant [Video] →
    • Tweet
    • Tags:
    • drivers
    • employee
    • Employees
    • employer
    • law
    • uber
    • uber drivers

    Latest News

    • Some Like It Hot – Check Out The Festival Of Fire This Weekend

      [imagesource:flickr] SA's hottest chilli festival is geared up to get tongues burning t...

    • Everything You Need To Know About The Best Treatment To Overhaul Skin Scarring

      [imagesource:skinkraft] If you're struggling with scarring, acne scarring, or deep wrin...

    • Marriage Proposal During Baseball Game Goes Horribly Wrong

      [imagesource:wallpaperflair] I speak from experience when I say the hours before a prop...

    • Trevor Noah And Roger Federer Get Lost In Switzerland For New Film [Video]

      [imagesource:instagram/trevornoah] Son of Patricia and our favourite comedic export, Tr...

    • Scientists Confirm Plants Makes Sounds When Harmed, And Now You Can Hear Their ‘Cries’

      [imagesource:flickr] We might have taken a few digs at the vegans this week, but surely...


    • 2oceansvibe Partners

    • CONTACT US
    • GOT A HOT STORY?
    • 2oceansvibe Radio
    • 2oceansvibe Media
    • Media Pack
    • Seth Rotherham
    • Café du Cap
    • Cabine du Cap
    • Cape Town City Accommodation
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Business
    • Media
    • Entertainment
    • Tech/Sci
    • World
    • Travel
    • Lifestyle
    • Sport
    • Politics
  • Follow

    2oceansvibe.com is part of the 2oceansVibe Media Group

    DMMA Logo